z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Autologous fibroblast therapy of the scar: A preclinical report
Author(s) -
Shih-Wei Yeh,
Mei-Yue Huang
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
dermatologica sinica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.604
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 2223-330X
pISSN - 1027-8117
DOI - 10.1016/j.dsi.2012.10.007
Subject(s) - medicine , fibroblast , dermatology , in vitro , biochemistry , chemistry
Surgical revision, dermabrasion, and laser therapy have been developed to improve scar over the past years. However, they were often associated with undesirable side effects such as erythema and hyperpigmentation. These side effects can be circumvented by autologous fibroblast injection, which provides a better control of the number of cells delivered and the depth of their placement. In this report, we describe a 31-year-old man presented with a traumatic forehead scar treated by autologous fibroblasts therapy. During 12 months of clinical follow-up, improvement on the color and the depth of the scar on patient’s forehead was observed. A 31-year-old man presented with a traumatic forehead scar measuring 0.3 6 cm (Figure 1A). He was injured by a broken glass bottle and thewound on his foreheadwas closed the same daywith eight stitches (nylon 5.0). The stitches were removed after 5 days and the patient came to Dr Mainz Clinic the next day. Results of a physical examination revealed that the lesion was erythematous edematous with irregular borders and palpation detected the lesion to be of fibroelastic consistency. After obtaining informed consent, the patient was included in the Institutional Research Board-approved autologous fibroblast transplantation therapy. In brief, the patient underwent a 4-mm posterior-auricular punch skin biopsy. The skin sample was placed in a cell culture medium at 4 C and sent to the Maria Von Med-Biotechnology Co., laboratory by following good tissue practices (GTPs). The skin sample was cut into small pieces and incubated overnight with medium containing dispase and collagenase at 37 C. The next day, isolated fibroblasts were cultured and multiplied over 8 weeks to produce 107 cells. The patient was given fibroblast injections 8 weeks after his first visit to the clinic and a clinical picture before administering the first injectionwas taken (Figure 1B). Two cycles of live fibroblast application were performed with an interval of 3 months. Each cycle consisted of three weekly applications of 107 live fibroblasts in 3 mL of Ringer’s solution. Each application consisted of 10–15 30-G needle injections with a distance of 0.1–0.2 mm between them and with a cell suspension of 0.1–0.2 mL in each injection. No adverse effects were observed during 12 months of clinical follow-up. Improvement in the color and the depth of the scar on patient’s forehead was observed (Figure 1C). Various techniques for scar treatment have been developed over the past years (e.g., surgical revision, dermabrasion, and laser therapy).1 Although some of these techniques were helpful in improving the scar, they were often associated with undesirable side effects such as erythema and hyperpigmentation.2 These side effects can be circumvented by autologous fibroblast injection, which provides a better control of the number of cells delivered and the depth of their placement. Our pilot study suggested that

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom