z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Breast implants, science and the court: The price of progress
Author(s) -
S KLATSKY
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
aesthetic surgery journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.528
H-Index - 58
eISSN - 1527-330X
pISSN - 1090-820X
DOI - 10.1016/j.asj.2007.01.001
Subject(s) - medicine , food and drug administration , breast implant , agency (philosophy) , breast surgery , breast augmentation , plastic surgery , implant , silicone , breast reconstruction , general surgery , surgery , medical emergency , breast cancer , cancer , chemistry , epistemology , organic chemistry , philosophy
The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) lifting of the 14-year ban on general access to silicone gel-filled breast implants in November 2006 was welcome news to plastic surgeons and patients seeking additional options for breast enhancement and reconstruction. As physicians who have more than 40 years of clinical experience with these devices, plastic surgeons have long expected the official recognition of implant safety and eventual lifting of most restrictions by the FDA. Nevertheless, the long process that has taken us from the 1992 FDA moratorium to the agency's current resolution of the controversy exacted a high price, both economically and emotionally.The breast implant controversy offers an example of how, in the world of modern journalism, emotion can take precedence over reason. Beginning in 1990, following the broadcast of a highly inflammatory segment on “Face to Face with Connie Chung,” patients' concerns over the safety of breast implants escalated to the level of a pandemic. The plastic surgery organizations, and others in the medical community, …

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom