Letter to the editor on “Titanium neck-titanium stem corrosion in a modular neck stem”

I read with interest the paper entitled by Shah, et al. [1], and I would like to congratulate the authors on a report that deals with the challenging problems of stem, neck, and head modularity. In my review of the case, I feel confident that the adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) (and likely the patient’s symptoms) was absolutely caused by corrosion of the cobalt-chromium alloy head and titanium (Ti) alloy trunnion. The serum Co of 4.8 ppb is certainly consistent with this diagnosis, as is the lack of an elevation in serum Ti. The authors seem to think that the ALTRmay have been caused by the Ti-Ti stem and neck junction in this paper, but I believe that this would be misleading to the journal readers. As Jacobs et al have pointed out, ALTR associated with Ti fretting and corrosion products on a submicron scale has not been described [1]. Cobalt submicron particles, on the other hand, have been shown conclusively to cause ALTR [2,3]. If the authors believe that the Ti alloy femoral neck-femoral stem modular junction was the main reason for this type of failure, they should consider analyzing the specimens with energydispersive X-ray or another method to evaluate material distribution in the corrosion products from the adverse reaction. Or, they should analyze the implants’ locking mechanisms/tapers. I recommend that the authors use a more sophisticated methodology if they believe that the titanium alloy junction was the problem and one of the reasons for ALTR in this patient. In the “Discussion” section of the case report, the authors noted that “this is the first case of neck-stem taper discoloration in this Ti alloy stem and only the third case of ALTR with this stem in MoP THA.” The other two cases were not identified in the article; these were the cases presented in the studies by Cooper, et al [4] and Matsen Ko, et al [5]. The authors described “avoiding the routine use of this stem, particularly given its vulnerability to corrosion,” but I do not feel that this recommendation is appropriate based only on their case. Using a nonecobalt-alloy head would, in my opinion, eliminate the rare risk of MACC (mechanically assisted