z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A large-scale cross-sectional and longitudinal study into the ecological validity of neuropsychological test measures in neurologically intact people
Author(s) -
Wim Van der Elst,
Martin P.J. van Boxtel,
Gerard van Breukelen,
Jelle Jolles
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
archives of clinical neuropsychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1873-5843
pISSN - 0887-6177
DOI - 10.1016/j.acn.2008.09.002
Subject(s) - neuropsychology , ecological validity , scale (ratio) , psychology , test (biology) , neuropsychological test , neuropsychological assessment , clinical psychology , ecology , cognition , psychiatry , geography , biology , cartography
It is often assumed that neuropsychological measures are ecologically valid in 'normal' people, but this assumption has not yet been thoroughly evaluated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the cross-sectional and longitudinal ecological validity of individual neuropsychological test scores and their composites in a large sample of neurologically intact people. Three neuropsychological composite measures were established, i.e. a "Memory Quotient", an "Executive functioning and Speed Quotient", and a "General Cognitive Quotient". The ecological validity of the individual neuropsychological measures and their composites was low to moderate. Multivariate models that included both neuropsychological and non-cognitive variables (i.e. demographic variables, depressive symptoms and anxiety) accounted for 4.6-21.4% of the variance in daily life functioning. The General Cognitive Quotient was the neuropsychological measure that was the most consistently related to daily life functioning.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom