The influence of different error estimates in the detection of postoperative cognitive dysfunction using reliable change indices with correction for practice effects
Author(s) -
M LEWIS,
Paul Maruff,
B SILBERT,
Lisbeth Evered,
D SCOTT
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
archives of clinical neuropsychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1873-5843
pISSN - 0887-6177
DOI - 10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.019
Subject(s) - neuropsychology , standard error , reliability (semiconductor) , standard deviation , gold standard (test) , error detection and correction , statistics , cognition , coronary artery bypass surgery , medicine , surgery , mathematics , artery , algorithm , psychiatry , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics
The reliable change index (RCI) expresses change relative to its associated error, and is useful in the identification of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). This paper examines four common RCIs that each account for error in different ways. Three rules incorporate a constant correction for practice effects and are contrasted with the standard RCI that had no correction for practice. These rules are applied to 160 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery who completed neuropsychological assessments preoperatively and 1 week postoperatively using error and reliability data from a comparable healthy nonsurgical control group. The rules all identify POCD in a similar proportion of patients, but the use of the within-subject standard deviation (WSD), expressing the effects of random error, as an error estimate is a theoretically appropriate denominator when a constant error correction, removing the effects of systematic error, is deducted from the numerator in a RCI.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom