English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

W e have used for this implant, 5 leads from 2 different producers: 2187 (16 pts), 4189 (18 pts), 4191 (25 pts) and 4193 (15 pts) from Medtronic and 4512 (48 pts) from Guidmt. As a parameter of better handl ing we have considered a reduced fluoro-time for the positioning of the LV lead. W e have made comparison in fluoro-time for each lead and dividing the 5 leads in two group: stylet-guided leads (4189 and 2187) and angioplasty-wire guided leads (4191,4193 and 4512). W e have not found any significant differences in fluoro-time nor for any of the considered leads neither for each group of leads. W e have also analysed if fluoro-time was related to single operator experience or to Centre experience. W e have found out that the longer the patient follow-up the longer the fluoro-time and the greater the number of patients implanted by the single operator the shorter the fluoro-time. In conclusion, OUT data seem to demonstrate that all the leads available on the market have the same good handl ing and that-once the operator has gained a good experience in such an intervention the mean fluoro-time required to position all the leads could be reduced to acceptable values.

europace

P-166 Guiding and optimization of resynchronization therapy with dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography and semi-automated border detection: A feasibility study