z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Requisite Simplicities to Help Negotiate Complex Problems
Author(s) -
Richard Stirzaker,
Harry Biggs,
Dirk J. Roux,
Paul Cilliers
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
ambio
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.564
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1654-7209
pISSN - 0044-7447
DOI - 10.1007/s13280-010-0075-7
Subject(s) - simplicity , negotiation , clarity , computer science , action (physics) , rule of thumb , resource (disambiguation) , natural resource management , management science , risk analysis (engineering) , natural resource , data science , knowledge management , business , political science , engineering , epistemology , computer network , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , physics , algorithm , quantum mechanics , law
Decision makers responsible for natural resource management often complain that science delivers fragmented information that is not useful at the scale of implementation. We offer a way of negotiating complex problems by putting forward a requisite simplicity. A requisite simplicity attempts to discard some detail, while retaining conceptual clarity and scientific rigor, and helps us move to a new position where we can benefit from new knowledge. We illustrate the above using three case studies: elephant densities and vegetation change in a national park, the use of rules of thumb to support decision making in agriculture, and the management of salt in irrigation. We identify potential requisite simplicities that can allow us to generate new understanding, lead to action and provide opportunities for structured learning.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Empowering knowledge with every search

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom