Reconciling Justice and Pleasure in Epicurean Contractarianism
Author(s) -
John Thrasher
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
ethical theory and moral practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.408
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1572-8447
pISSN - 1386-2820
DOI - 10.1007/s10677-012-9348-5
Subject(s) - epicureanism , social contract , hedonism , philosophy , epistemology , economic justice , teleology , political philosophy , pleasure , law and economics , sociology , law , political science , politics , psychology , neuroscience
Epicurean contractarianism is an attempt to reconcile individualistic hedonism with a robust account of justice. The pursuit of pleasure and the requirements of justice, however, have seemed to be incompatible to many commentators, both ancient and modern. It is not clear how it is possible to reconcile hedonism with the demands of justice. Furthermore, it is not clear why, even if Epicurean contractarianism is possible, it would be necessary for Epicureans to endorse a social contract. I argue here that Epicurean contractarianism is both possible and necessary once we understand Epicurean practical rationality in a new way. We are left with an appealing version of teleological, individualistic contractarianism that is significantly different from Hobbesian contractarianism.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom