z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Reasoning on temporal class diagrams: Undecidability results
Author(s) -
Alessandro Artale
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
annals of mathematics and artificial intelligence
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.369
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1573-7470
pISSN - 1012-2443
DOI - 10.1007/s10472-006-9019-0
Subject(s) - story driven modeling , undecidable problem , class (philosophy) , computer science , class diagram , temporal logic , satisfiability , theoretical computer science , semantics (computer science) , core (optical fiber) , artificial intelligence , decidability , programming language , unified modeling language , telecommunications , software
This paper introduces a temporal class diagram language useful to model temporal varying data. The atemporal portion of the language contains the core constructors available in both EER diagrams and UML class diagrams. The temporal part of the language is able to distinguish between temporal and atemporal constructs, and it has the ability to represent dynamic constraints between classes. The language is characterized by a model-theoretic (temporal) semantics. Reasoning services as logical implication and satisfiability are also defined. We show that reasoning on finite models is different from reasoning on unrestricted ones. Then, we prove that reasoning on temporal class diagrams is an undecidable problem on both unrestricted models and on finite ones.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom