z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A BDI agent programming language with failure handling, declarative goals, and planning
Author(s) -
Sebastian Sardiña,
Lin Padgham
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.432
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1573-7454
pISSN - 1387-2532
DOI - 10.1007/s10458-010-9130-9
Subject(s) - computer science , deliberation , plan (archaeology) , context (archaeology) , selection (genetic algorithm) , declarative programming , order (exchange) , software engineering , knowledge management , process management , artificial intelligence , programming paradigm , programming language , inductive programming , engineering , business , finance , paleontology , archaeology , politics , biology , political science , law , history
Agents are an important technology that have the potential to take over contemporary methods for analysing, designing, and implementing complex software. The Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) agent paradigm has proven to be one of the major approaches to intelligent agent systems, both in academia and in industry. Typical BDI agent-oriented programming languages rely on user-provided "plan libraries" to achieve goals, and online context sensitive subgoal selection and expansion. These allow for the development of systems that are extremely flexible and responsive to the environment, and as a result, well suited for complex applications with (soft) real-time reasoning and control requirements. Nonetheless, complex decision making that goes beyond, but is compatible with, run-time context-dependent plan selection is one of the most natural and important next steps within this technology. In this paper we develop a typical BDI-style agent-oriented programming language that enhances usual BDI programming style with three distinguished features: declarative goals, look-ahead planning, and failure handling. First, an account that mixes both procedural and declarative aspects of goals is necessary in order to reason about important properties of goals and to decouple plans from what these plans are meant to achieve. Second, lookahead deliberation about the effects of one choice of expansion over another is clearly desirable or even mandatory in many circumstances so as to guarantee goal achievability and to avoid undesired situations. Finally, a failure handling mechanism, suitably integrated with both declarative goals and planning, is required in order to model an adequate level of commitment to goals, as well as to be consistent with most real BDI implemented systems.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom