Investigating the interaction of direct and indirect relation on memory judgments and retrieval
Author(s) -
Nicholas P. Maxwell,
Erin Michelle Buchanan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
cognitive processing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.51
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1612-4790
pISSN - 1612-4782
DOI - 10.1007/s10339-019-00935-w
Subject(s) - psychology , recall , association (psychology) , cognitive psychology , associative property , task (project management) , cued recall , word association , cognition , similarity (geometry) , recall test , associative learning , free recall , semantic similarity , artificial intelligence , computer science , mathematics , management , neuroscience , psychoanalysis , pure mathematics , economics , image (mathematics) , psychotherapist
This study examined the interactive relationship between two measures of association (direct and indirect associations) when predicting relatedness judgments and cued-recall performance. Participants were recruited from Amazon's Mechanical Turk and were given word pairs of varying relatedness to judge for their semantic, thematic, and associative strength. After completing a distractor task, participants then completed a cued-recall task. First, we sought to expand previous work on judgments of associative memory to include semantic- and thematic-based judgments (judgments of relatedness), while also replicating bias and sensitivity findings. Next, we tested for an interaction between direct and indirect association when predicting participant judgments while also expanding upon previous work by examining that interaction when predicting recall. The interaction between direct and indirect association was significant for both judgments and recall. For low indirect association, direct association was the primary predictor of both judgment strength and recall proportions. However, this trend reversed for high indirect association, as higher levels of indirect relation decreased the effectiveness of direct relation as a predictor. Overall, our findings indicate the degree to which the processing of similarity information impacts cognitive processes such as retrieval and item judgments, while also parsing apart the underlying, interactive relationship that exists between the norms used to represent concept information.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom