z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Complications of ear mold impressions: two case reports
Author(s) -
Clara Silva,
Ana Margarida Amorim,
Carla Gapo,
António Paiva
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
european archives of oto-rhino-laryngology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1434-4726
pISSN - 0937-4477
DOI - 10.1007/s00405-014-3217-x
Subject(s) - medicine , conductive hearing loss , pure tone audiometry , middle ear , surgery , tympanic membrane perforation , incus , tympanoplasty , perforation , hearing loss , audiometry , ear canal , foreign body , audiology , dentistry , radiology , stapes , materials science , punching , metallurgy
An 8-year-old male, with a past history of right chronic otitis media, with tympanic membrane perforation was advised to use an external auditory canal protector for preventing the entrance of water in the ear. This was a measure to prevent the occurrence of infections before further surgery. During the process of impression taking, the patient experienced extreme pain and worsening of hearing loss and the ear mold was impossible to remove. He was referred to the ENT emergency department where in otoscopy, it was possible to see a foreign material under the tympanic membrane (Fig. 1). Audiometry evidenced a conductive hearing loss with an air bone GAP of 45 dB (Fig. 2a). The computerized tomography (CT) demonstrated the filling of the middle ear and antrum, with a soft tissue density material, without bone erosion (Fig. 2b). A right atticotomy with type I tympanoplasty, with removal of the foreign material was performed. The postoperative period held uneventful.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom