z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Oversight in Surgical Innovation: A Response to Ethical Challenges
Author(s) -
Gupta Saksham,
Muskens Ivo S.,
Fandino Luis Bradley,
Hulsbergen Alexander F. C.,
Broekman Marike L. D.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
world journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.115
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1432-2323
pISSN - 0364-2313
DOI - 10.1007/s00268-018-4565-2
Subject(s) - medicine , dignity , engineering ethics , political science , engineering , law
Background Surgical innovation has advanced outcomes in the field, but carries inherent risk for surgeons and patients alike. Oversight mechanisms exist to support surgeon‐innovators through difficulties associated with the innovation process. Methods A literature review of ethical risks and oversight mechanisms was conducted. Results Oversight mechanisms range from the historical concept of surgical exceptionalism to departmental, hospital, and centralized committees. These fragmentary and non‐standardized oversight mechanisms leave surgeon‐innovators and patients open to significant risk of breaching the ethical principles at the core of surgical practice. A systematized approach that mitigates these risks while maintaining the independence and dignity of the surgical profession is necessary. We propose an oversight framework that incorporates multiple structures tailored toward the ethical risk introduced by different forms of innovation. Discussion We summarize ethical risks and current regulatory structures, and we then use these findings to outline an oversight framework that may be applied to surgical practice.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here