
Abdominal Wound Dehiscence in Adults: Development and Validation of a Risk Model
Author(s) -
Ramshorst Gabriëlle H.,
Nieuwenhuizen Jeroen,
Hop Wim C. J.,
Arends Pauline,
Boom Johan,
Jeekel Johannes,
Lange Johan F.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
world journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.115
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1432-2323
pISSN - 0364-2313
DOI - 10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y
Subject(s) - medicine , dehiscence , wound dehiscence , abdominal surgery , surgery , population , univariate analysis , risk factor , multivariate analysis , environmental health
Background Several studies have been performed to identify risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence. No risk model had yet been developed for the general surgical population. The objective of the present study was to identify independent risk factors for abdominal wound dehiscence and to develop a risk model to recognize high‐risk patients. Identification of high‐risk patients offers opportunities for intervention strategies. Methods Medical registers from January 1985 to December 2005 were searched. Patients who had primarily undergone appendectomies or nonsurgical (e.g., urological) operations were excluded. Each patient with abdominal wound dehiscence was matched with three controls by systematic random sampling. Putative relevant patient‐related, operation‐related, and postoperative variables were evaluated in univariate analysis and subsequently entered in multivariate stepwise logistic regression models to delineate major independent predictors of abdominal wound dehiscence. A risk model was developed, which was validated in a population of patients who had undergone operation between January and December 2006. Results A total of 363 cases and 1,089 controls were analyzed. Major independent risk factors were age, gender, chronic pulmonary disease, ascites, jaundice, anemia, emergency surgery, type of surgery, postoperative coughing, and wound infection. In the validation population, risk scores were significantly higher ( P < 0.001) for patients with abdominal wound dehiscence ( n = 19) compared to those without ( n = 677). Resulting scores ranged from 0 to 8.5, and the risk for abdominal wound dehiscence over this range increased exponentially from 0.02% to 70.1%. Conclusions The validated risk model shows high predictive value for abdominal wound dehiscence and may help to identify patients at increased risk.