Measuring Surgical Quality: What’s the Role of Provider Volume?
Author(s) -
Dimick Justin B.,
Birkmeyer John D.,
Upchurch Gilbert R.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
world journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.115
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1432-2323
pISSN - 0364-2313
DOI - 10.1007/s00268-005-7989-4
Subject(s) - quality (philosophy) , volume (thermodynamics) , measure (data warehouse) , vascular surgery , cardiothoracic surgery , cardiac surgery , resource based relative value scale , medicine , value (mathematics) , purchasing , marketing , surgery , business , computer science , nursing , data mining , philosophy , physics , epistemology , quantum mechanics , machine learning
Although not ideal for all situations, provider volume is particularly suited for measuring surgical quality in certain contexts. Specifically, we believe that for uncommon operations with a strong volumes–outcome effect, provider volume may be the most informative performance measure. Because of the relative ease of determining provider volume, it will continue to be used in value‐based purchasing and public reporting efforts. With increasing momentum from outside the profession of surgery, it is particularly important for surgeons to participate in making decisions regarding situations where volume may be an appropriate measure of quality.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom