z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Weighting waiting in collective decision-making
Author(s) -
Robert Planqué,
Anna Dornhaus,
Nigel R. Franks,
Tim Kovacs,
James A. R. Marshall
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
behavioral ecology and sociobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.203
H-Index - 120
eISSN - 1432-0762
pISSN - 0340-5443
DOI - 10.1007/s00265-006-0263-4
Subject(s) - animal ecology , nest (protein structural motif) , weighting , compromise , flexibility (engineering) , procrastination , biology , ecology , operations research , statistics , mathematics , social psychology , psychology , medicine , social science , biochemistry , sociology , radiology
Animals searching for food, mates, or a home often need to decide when to stop looking and choose the best option found so far. By re-analyzing experimental data from experiments by Mallon et al. (Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:352–359, 2001), we demonstrate that house-hunting ant colonies are gradually more committed to new nests during the emigration. Early in house-hunting, individual ants were flexibly committed to new nest sites. However, when carrying to a new nest had started, ants hardly ever switched preference. Using a theoretical model based on experimental data, we test at which stage flexible commitment influences speed and accuracy most. We demonstrate that ant colonies have found a good compromise between impatience and procrastination. Early flexibility combined with later rigidity is identically effective as other strategies that include flexible commitment, but it is particularly good when emigration conditions are harsh.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom