Effects of response-set size on error-related brain activity
Author(s) -
Martin E. Maier,
Marco Steinhauser,
Ronald Hübner
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
experimental brain research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.782
H-Index - 172
eISSN - 1432-1106
pISSN - 0014-4819
DOI - 10.1007/s00221-010-2160-3
Subject(s) - error related negativity , stimulus (psychology) , psychology , negativity effect , set (abstract data type) , response inhibition , audiology , stimulus–response compatibility , differential effects , amplitude , mathematics , neuroscience , cognitive psychology , cognition , computer science , anterior cingulate cortex , physics , medicine , quantum mechanics , programming language
To study the effect of response-set size on action monitoring processes, the error-related negativity (Ne/ERN), the correct-related negativity (Nc/CRN), and behavioral indicators of action monitoring were compared across three groups of participants performing a two-choice, a four-choice, or an eight-choice version of the flanker task. After controlling for differential contribution of stimulus-related activity to response-locked averages resulting from large differences in response times across conditions, response-set size had strong effects on Ne/ERN and Nc/CRN. With increasing response-set size, the Ne/ERN amplitude decreased, but the Nc/CRN amplitude increased. Moreover, post-error behavioral adjustments were impaired with an increasing response-set size. These results suggest that action monitoring severely suffers when response-set size is increased. Implications of these findings for present theories of Ne/ERN and Nc/CRN are discussed.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom