Open AccessDerotational distal femoral osteotomy for patients with recurrent patellar instability and increased femoral antetorsion improves knee function and adequately treats both torsional and valgus malalignment
Author(s) -
Hinz Maximilian,
Cotic Matthias,
Diermeier Theresa,
Imhoff Florian B.,
Feuerriegel Georg C.,
Woertler Klaus,
Themessl Alexander,
Imhoff Andreas B.,
Achtnich Andrea
Publication year - 2023
Publication title -
knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.806
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1433-7347
pISSN - 0942-2056
DOI - 10.1007/s00167-022-07150-9
Subject(s) - medicine , coronal plane , visual analogue scale , valgus , malunion , genu valgum , interquartile range , radiological weapon , surgery , osteotomy , patellofemoral pain syndrome , femur , radiology , nonunion , alternative medicine , pathology
Purpose The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome following derotational distal femoral osteotomy (D‐DFO) in patients with high‐grade patellofemoral instability (PFI) and an associated increased femoral antetorsion (FA). It was hypothesized that D‐DFO would lead to a good functional and radiological outcome, and that both torsional and coronal malalignment could be normalized. Methods Patients that underwent D‐DFO between 06/2011 and 12/2018 for high‐grade PFI with an increased FA (> 20°) were included. Patient‐reported outcome measures (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] for pain, Kujala score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form [IKDC], and Tegner Activity Scale [TAS]) were evaluated pre‐ and minimum 24 months postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lower extremity and weight‐bearing whole‐leg anteroposterior radiographs were conducted pre‐ and postoperatively. The change in FA, coronal limb alignment, and PROMs were tested for statistical significance. Results In total, 27 patients (30 knees) were included. The D‐DFO aimed to only correct FA (Group 1) or to additionally perform a varization (Group 2) in 14 cases each. In the remaining two cases, double‐level osteotomies were performed to correct additional tibial deformities. In 25 cases (83.3%), concomitant procedures also addressing patellofemoral instability were performed. At follow‐up (38.0 months [25–75% interquartile range 31.8–52.5 months]), a significant reduction in pain (VAS for pain: 2.0 [1.0–5.0] vs. 0 [0–1.0], p < 0.05), significant improvement in knee function (Kujala Score: 55.6 ± SD 13.6 vs. 80.3 ± 16.7, p < 0.05; Lysholm Score: 58.6 ± 17.4 vs. 79.5 ± 16.6, p < 0.05; IKDC: 54.6 ± 18.7 vs. 74.1 ± 15.0, p < 0.05), and an increase in sporting activity (TAS: 3.0 [3.0–4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0–5.0], p = n.s.) were reported. Femoral antetorsion was significantly reduced (28.2 ± 6.4° vs. 13.6 ± 5.2°, p < 0.05). A significant varization was observed in Group 2 (2.4 ± 1.2° valgus vs. 0.3 ± 2.4° valgus; p < 0.05). In one case, patellar redislocation occurred 70 months postoperatively. Conclusion In patients with PFI and an associated increased FA, D‐DFO achieved a significant reduction in pain, an improvement of subjective knee function, as well as an adequate correction of torsional and coronal alignment. Level of evidence Retrospective case series, Level IV.