Open AccessArithmetic hip‐knee‐ankle angle and stressed hip‐knee‐ankle angle: equivalent methods for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty
Author(s) -
Tarassoli Payam,
Wood Jil A.,
Chen Darren B.,
GriffithsJones Will,
Bellemans Johan,
MacDessi Samuel J.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.806
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1433-7347
pISSN - 0942-2056
DOI - 10.1007/s00167-022-07038-8
Subject(s) - medicine , knee arthritis , ankle , radiography , nuclear medicine , arthritis , deformity , orthodontics , total knee arthroplasty , surgery , osteoarthritis , alternative medicine , pathology
Abstract Purpose Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) relies on precise determination of constitutional alignment to set resection targets. The arithmetic hip‐knee‐ankle angle (aHKA) is a radiographic method to estimate constitutional alignment following onset of arthritis. Intraoperatively, constitutional alignment may also be approximated using navigation‐based angular measurements of deformity correction, termed the stressed HKA (sHKA). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between these methods of estimating constitutional alignment to better understand their utility in KA TKA. Methods A radiological and intraoperative computer‐assisted navigation study was undertaken comparing measurements of the aHKA using radiographs and computed tomography (CT‐aHKA) to the sHKA in 88 TKAs meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the difference in the paired means between the three methods to determine constitutional alignment (aHKA, CT‐aHKA, sHKA). Secondary outcomes included testing agreement across measurements using Bland‐Altman plots and analysis of subgroup differences based on different patterns of compartmental arthritis. Results There were no statistically significant differences between any paired comparison or across groups (aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.1°, p = 0.817; aHKA vs. CT‐aHKA: 0.3°, p = 0.643; CT‐aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.2°, p = 0.722; ANOVA, p = 0.845). Bland‐Altman plots were consistent with good agreement for all comparisons, with approximately 95% of values within limits of agreement. There was no difference in the three paired comparisons (aHKA, CT‐aHKA, and sHKA) for knees with medial compartment arthritis. However, these findings were not replicated in knees with lateral compartment arthritis. Conclusions There was no significant difference between the arithmetic HKA (whether obtained using CT or radiographs) and the stressed HKA in this analysis. These findings further validate the preoperative arithmetic method and support use of the intraoperative stressed HKA as techniques to restore constitutional lower limb alignment in KA TKA. Level of evidence III.