
Virtual reality rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Author(s) -
Gazendam Aaron,
Zhu Meng,
Chang Yaping,
Phillips Steve,
Bhandari Mohit
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.806
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1433-7347
pISSN - 0942-2056
DOI - 10.1007/s00167-022-06910-x
Subject(s) - meta analysis , total knee arthroplasty , randomized controlled trial , rehabilitation , arthroplasty , physical therapy , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery
Purpose The use of virtual reality (VR) based rehabilitation has increased substantially within orthopedic surgery, particularly in the field of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to compare patient‐reported outcomes and cost analyses from randomized controlled trials (RCT) utilizing VR‐based rehabilitation in patients following TKA. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for RCTs involving VR‐based rehabilitation following TKA. Quantitative synthesis was conducted for pain scores and functional outcomes. Narrative outcomes were reported for results not amenable to quantitative synthesis. Results A total of 9 RCTs with 835 patients were included with follow‐up ranging from 10 days to 6 months postoperatively. No differences in pain scores were demonstrated between VR‐based and traditional rehabilitation at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively. VR‐based rehabilitation demonstrated improved functional outcomes at 12 weeks ( n = 353) postoperatively [mean difference (MD) − 3.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) − 5.20 to − 1.45, moderate certainty evidence] and 6 months ( n = 66) postoperatively [MD − 4.75, 95% CI − 6.69 to − 2.81, low certainty evidence], compared to traditional rehabilitation. One trial demonstrated significant cost savings with the use of VR‐based rehabilitation. Conclusions VR‐based rehabilitation for patients undergoing TKA represents an evolving field that may have advantages over traditional therapy for some patients. The current review is limited by the low quality of evidence in the literature. This is a rapidly evolving field with more trials needed to determine the impact of VR‐based rehabilitation on patients undergoing TKA. Level of evidence Level I; meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials.