Open AccessSki‐geometric parameters do not differ between ACL injury mechanisms in recreational alpine skiing
Author(s) -
Posch Markus,
Ruedl Gerhard,
Greier Klaus,
Faulhaber Martin,
Tecklenburg Katja,
Schranz Alois,
Burtscher Martin
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.806
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1433-7347
pISSN - 0942-2056
DOI - 10.1007/s00167-021-06852-w
Subject(s) - acl injury , falling (accident) , alpine skiing , medicine , physical medicine and rehabilitation , injury prevention , anterior cruciate ligament , physical therapy , poison control , surgery , medical emergency , environmental health
Purpose It is not known so far if ski‐equipment‐related factors differ between the ACL injury mechanisms, potentially influencing the circumstances and causes of falling, finally resulting in ACL injury. More specifically focusing on the injury mechanisms will provide a deeper understanding of injury causation. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether ACL injury mechanisms in recreational alpine skiing differ with regard to ski‐geometric parameters, self‐reported circumstances and causes of accident and injury severity. Methods Among a cohort of 392 ACL‐injured (57.9% females) skiers, age, sex, height, weight, skill level, risk‐taking behavior, circumstances and causes of accident, and ACL injury severity were collected by questionnaire. Additionally, patients had to recall their type of fall (ACL injury mechanism) by classifying forward and backward falls with and without body rotation. Ski length, side cut radius and widths of the tip, waist and tail were directly notated from the ski. Results The forward fall with body rotation was the most common reported ACL injury mechanism (63%). A riskier behavior was associated with forward falls without body rotation. Ski‐geometric parameters did not significantly influence the type of ACL injury mechanism. Regarding accident characteristics, catching an edge of the ski was more frequent ( p < 0.001) the cause for forward falls (75% and 67%) when compared to the backward falls (46 and 15%) and executing a turn was the most frequent action in all falls (39–68%). A complete rupture of the ACL (66–70%) was more commonly reported than a partial tear (30–34%) among all four non‐contact ACL injury mechanisms (n.s.). Conclusion In contrast to risk‐taking behavior and accident characteristics, ski‐geometric parameters and injury severity do not significantly differ between ACL injury mechanisms in recreational skiing. Thus, an individual skiing style seems to have more impact on ACL injury mechanisms than ski equipment. Future studies should evaluate potential effects of ski geometry on the incidence of ACL injury. Level of evidence III.