Open AccessConcomitant full‐thickness cartilage lesions do not affect patient‐reported outcomes at minimum 10‐year follow‐up after ACL reconstruction
Author(s) -
Wang Katherine,
Eftang Cathrine N.,
Ulstein Svend,
Årøen Asbjørn,
Jakobsen Rune B.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.806
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1433-7347
pISSN - 0942-2056
DOI - 10.1007/s00167-021-06757-8
Subject(s) - medicine , concomitant , cartilage , anterior cruciate ligament , osteoarthritis , anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , lesion , cohort , surgery , acl injury , cohort study , pathology , anatomy , alternative medicine
Purpose To compare patients with a concomitant full‐thickness cartilage lesion and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury to patients with an isolated ACL injury at 10–15 years post ACL reconstruction. Methods This is a longitudinal follow‐up of a cohort of 89 patients that were identified in the Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registry and included in the index study in 2007. The study group consisted of 30 patients that underwent ACL reconstruction and had a concomitant, isolated full‐thickness cartilage lesion (International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade 3–4). Each study patient was matched with two control patients who underwent ACL reconstruction but had no cartilage lesions (ICRS grade 1–4) ( n = 59). At a median follow‐up of 10.2 years (range 9.9–15.6), 65 patients (74%) completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), which was the main outcome measure, resulting in 23 pairs after matching. Results At a follow‐up of 10–15 years after ACL reconstruction, no significant differences in KOOS were found between patients with a concomitant full‐thickness cartilage lesion and patients without cartilage lesions. There was also no significant difference between the two groups when comparing the change over time in KOOS scores from preoperative to follow‐up. Both groups showed significant improvement in all KOOS subscales from preoperative to follow‐up, except for in the Symptoms subscale for the control group. The greatest improvement was in the QoL subscale for the study group. Conclusion ACL‐reconstructed patients with a full‐thickness cartilage lesion did not report worse outcomes at 10–15 years after surgery compared with patients with an isolated ACL injury. Our findings support that there is no long‐term negative effect of a concomitant cartilage lesion in an ACL‐reconstructed knee. These findings should be considered when discussing treatment and informing about the expected long‐term outcome after ACL reconstruction to patients with such combined injuries. Level of evidence II.