Open AccessAcromioclavicular joint reconstruction implants have differing ability to restore horizontal and vertical plane stability
Author(s) -
Alkoheji Mohamed,
ElDaou Hadi,
Lee Jillian,
Carlos Adrian,
Di Mascio Livio,
Amis Andrew A.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.806
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1433-7347
pISSN - 0942-2056
DOI - 10.1007/s00167-021-06700-x
Subject(s) - coracoid , acromioclavicular joint , joint stability , orthodontics , implant , medicine , anatomy , surgery , alternative medicine , pathology
Purpose Persistent acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability following high grade injuries causes significant symptoms. The importance of horizontal plane stability is increasingly recognised. There is little evidence of the ability of current implant methods to restore native ACJ stability in the vertical and horizontal planes. The purpose of this work was to measure the ability of three implant reconstructions to restore native ACJ stability. Methods Three groups of nine fresh‐frozen shoulders each were mounted into a robotic testing system. The scapula was stationary and the robot displaced the clavicle to measure native anterior, posterior, superior and inferior (A, P, S, I) stability at 50 N force. The ACJ capsule, conoid and trapezoid ligaments were transected and the ACJ was reconstructed using one of three commercially available systems. Two systems (tape loop + screw and tape loop + button) wrapped a tape around the clavicle and coracoid, the third system (sutures + buttons) passed directly through tunnels in the clavicle and coracoid. The stabilities were remeasured. The data for A, P, S, I stability and ranges of A–P and S–I stability were analyzed by ANOVA and repeated‐measures Student t tests with Bonferroni correction, to contrast each reconstruction stability versus the native ACJ data for that set of nine specimens, and examined contrasts among the reconstructions. Results All three reconstructions restored the range of A–P stability to that of the native ACJ. However, the coracoid loop devices shifted the clavicle anteriorly. For S–I stability, only the sutures + buttons reconstruction did not differ significantly from native ligament restraint. Conclusions Only the sutures + buttons reconstruction, that passed directly through tunnels in the clavicle and coracoid, restored all stability measures (A, P, S, I) to the native values, while the tape implants wrapped around the bones anteriorised the clavicle. These findings show differing abilities among reconstructions to restore native stability in horizontal and vertical planes. (300 words)