Open AccessThe medial condylar wall is a reliable landmark to kinematically align the femoral component in medial UKA: an in‐silico study
Author(s) -
Preston Benjamin,
Harris Simon,
Villet Loic,
Mattathil Collin,
Cobb Justin,
Rivière Charles
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.806
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1433-7347
pISSN - 0942-2056
DOI - 10.1007/s00167-021-06683-9
Subject(s) - condyle , valgus , anatomy , coronal plane , medial axis , landmark , orthodontics , medicine , kinematics , geometry , physics , mathematics , artificial intelligence , computer science , classical mechanics
Purpose Kinematic alignment (KA) aligns the femoral implant perpendicular to the cylindrical axis in the frontal and axial plane. Identification of the kinematic axes when using the mini‐invasive sub‐quadricipital approach is challenging in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study aims to assess if the orientation of condylar walls may be suitable for use as an anatomical landmark to kinematically align the femoral component in medial UKA. It was hypothesised that the medial wall of the medial condyle would prove to be a reliable anatomical landmark to set both the frontal and axial alignment of the femoral component in medial UKA. Methods 73 patients undergoing medial UKA had pre‐operative CT imaging to generate 3D models. Those with osteophytes that impaired visualisation of the condylar walls were excluded. 28 patients were included in the study. The ideal KA was determined using the cylindrical axis in the frontal and axial plane. Simulations using the medial wall of the medial condyle (MWMC) and the lateral wall of the medial condyle (LWMC) were performed to set the frontal alignment. To set the axial alignment, the MWMC, LWMC, medial wall of the lateral condyle (MWLC), and medial diagonal line (MDL) anatomical landmarks were investigated. Differences between the ideal measured KA values and values obtained using landmarks were investigated. Results Use of the MWMC let to similar frontal alignment compared to the ideal KA (2.9° valgus vs 3.4° valgus, p = 0.371) with 46.4% (13/28) of measurements being ≤ 1.0° different from the ideal KA and only 1 simulation with greater than 4.0° difference. Use of the MWMC led to very similar axial alignments compared to the ideal KA (0.5° internal vs 0.0°, p = 0.960) with 75.0% (21/28) of measurements being ≤ 1.0 o different from the ideal KA, and a maximum difference of 3.0°. Use of the MWLC and MDL was associated with significant statistical differences when compared to the ideal KA ( p < 0.001 for both). Conclusions The native orientation of the medial condylar wall seems to be a reliable anatomical landmark for aligning the femoral component in medial KA UKA in both the axial plane and frontal planes. Other assessed landmarks were shown to not be reliable. Clinical and radiographic assessments of the reliability of using the MWMC to set the frontal and axial orientation of the femoral component when performing a medial KA UKA are needed.