Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Return to Sport Consensus Group
Author(s) -
Meredith Sean J.,
Rauer Thomas,
Chmielewski Terese L.,
Fink Christian,
Diermeier Theresa,
Rothrauff Benjamin B.,
Svantesson Eleonor,
Hamrin Senorski Eric,
Hewett Timothy E.,
Sherman Seth L.,
Lesniak Bryson P.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.806
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1433-7347
pISSN - 0942-2056
DOI - 10.1007/s00167-020-06009-1
Subject(s) - anterior cruciate ligament , acl injury , medicine , sports medicine , return to sport , rehabilitation , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery
Purpose A precise and consistent definition of return to sport (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is lacking, and there is controversy surrounding the process of returning patients to sports and their previous activity level. The aim of the Panther Symposium ACL Injury RTS Consensus Group was to provide a clear definition of RTS and description of the RTS continuum, as well as to provide clinical guidance on RTS testing and decision‐making. Methods An international, multidisciplinary group of ACL experts convened as part of a consensus meeting. Consensus statements were developed using a modified Delphi method. Literature review was performed to report the supporting evidence. Results Key points include that RTS is characterized by achievement of the pre‐injury level of sport and involves a criteria‐based progression from return to participation to return to sport, and ultimately return to performance. Purely time‐based RTS decision‐making should be abandoned. Progression occurs along a RTS continuum with decision‐making by a multidisciplinary group that incorporates objective physical examination data and validated and peer‐reviewed RTS tests, which should involve functional assessment as well as psychological readiness. Consideration should be given to biological healing, contextual factors and concomitant injuries. Conclusion The resultant consensus statements and scientific rationale aim to inform the reader of the complex process of RTS after ACL injury that occurs along a dynamic continuum. Research is needed to determine the ideal RTS test battery, the best implementation of psychological readiness testing and methods for the biologic assessment of healing and recovery. Level of evidence IV.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom