Open AccessIncreased odds of patient‐reported success at 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients without cartilage lesions: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register
Author(s) -
Hamrin Senorski Eric,
AlentornGeli Eduard,
Musahl Volker,
Fu Freddie,
Krupic Ferid,
Desai Neel,
Westin Olof,
Samuelsson Kristian
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.806
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1433-7347
pISSN - 0942-2056
DOI - 10.1007/s00167-017-4592-9
Subject(s) - medicine , anterior cruciate ligament , anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , meniscus , concomitant , surgery , cohort , hamstring , osteoarthritis , medial meniscus , physics , alternative medicine , incidence (geometry) , pathology , optics
Purpose To investigate whether the surgical technique of single‐bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the visualization of anatomic surgical factors and the presence or absence of concomitant injuries at primary ACL reconstruction are able to predict patient‐reported success and failure. The hypothesis of this study was that anatomic single‐bundle surgical procedures would be predictive of patient‐reported success. Methods This cohort study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register during the period of 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2014. Patients who underwent primary single‐bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons were included. Details on surgical technique were collected using an online questionnaire comprising essential anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist items, defined as the utilization of accessory medial portal drilling, anatomic tunnel placement, the visualization of insertion sites and pertinent landmarks. A univariate logistic regression model adjusted for age and gender was used to determine predictors of patient‐reported success and failure, i.e. 20th and 80th percentile, respectively, in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Results In the 6889 included patients, the surgical technique used for single‐bundle ACL reconstruction did not predict the predefined patient‐reported success or patient‐reported failure in the KOOS 4 . Patient‐reported success was predicted by the absence of concomitant injury to the meniscus (OR = 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72–0.92], p = 0.001) and articular cartilage (OR = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.61–0.81], p < 0.001). Patient‐reported failure was predicted by the presence of a concomitant injury to the articular cartilage (OR = 1.27 [95% CI, 1.11–1.44], p < 0.001). Conclusion Surgical techniques used in primary single‐bundle ACL reconstruction did not predict the KOOS 2 years after the reconstruction. However, the absence of concomitant injuries at index surgery predicted patient‐reported success in the KOOS. The results provide further evidence that concomitant injuries at ACL reconstruction affect subjective knee function and a detailed knowledge of the treatment of these concomitant injuries is needed. Level of evidence Retrospective cohort study, Level III.