z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Dissimilarity criteria and their comparison for quantitative evaluation of image segmentation: application to human retina vessels
Author(s) -
Yann Gavet,
Mathieu Fernandes,
Johan Debayle,
JeanCharles Pinoli
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
machine vision and applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.37
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1432-1769
pISSN - 0932-8092
DOI - 10.1007/s00138-014-0625-2
Subject(s) - segmentation , consistency (knowledge bases) , artificial intelligence , computer science , task (project management) , computer vision , pattern recognition (psychology) , image (mathematics) , perception , image segmentation , psychology , engineering , systems engineering , neuroscience
International audienceThe quantitative evaluation of image segmentation is an important and difficult task that is required for making a decision on the choice of a segmentation method and for the optimal tuning of its parameter values. To perform this quantitative evaluation, dissimilarity criteria are relevant with respect to the human visual perception, contrary to metrics that have been shown to be visually not adapted. This article proposes to compare eleven dissimilarity criteria together. The field of retina vessels image segmentation is taken as an application issue to emphasize the comparison of five specific image segmentation methods, with regard to their degrees of consistency and discriminancy. The DRIVE and STARE databases of retina images are employed and the manual/visual segmentations are used as a reference and as a control method. The so-called ϵ criterion gives results in agreement with perceptually based criterions for achieving the quantitative comparison

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom