z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
On an inequality of Sagher and Zhou concerning Stein’s lemma
Author(s) -
Marco Ani,
Loukas Grafakos,
Petr Honzík
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
collectanea mathematica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.715
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 2038-4815
pISSN - 0010-0757
DOI - 10.1007/bf03191373
Subject(s) - mathematics , lacunary function , lemma (botany) , combinatorics , infimum and supremum , sequence (biology) , discrete mathematics , ecology , genetics , poaceae , biology
We provide two alternative proofs of the following formulation of Stein’s lemma obtained by Sagher and Zhou [6]: there exists a constant A > 0 such that for any measurable setE⊂ [0, 1], |E| ≠ 0, there is an integerN that depends only onE such that for any square-summable real-valued sequence {ck} k =0/∞ we have: $$A \cdot \sum\limits_{k > N} {\left| {c_k } \right|} ^2 \leqslant \mathop {sup}\limits_I \mathop {inf}\limits_{a \in \mathbb{R}} \frac{1}{{\left| I \right|}} \int_{I \cap E} {\left| {f(t) - a} \right|^2 } dt,$$ (1) where the supremum is taken over all dyadic intervals I and $$f(t) = \sum\limits_{k = 0}^\infty {c_k r_k } (t),$$wherer k denotes thekth Rademacher function. The first proof does not rely on Khintchine’s inequality while the second is succinct and applies to general lacunary Walsh series.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom