Model for quantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators | Zendy

P. Vinkler | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Model for quantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators

Author(s) -

P. Vinkler

Publication year - 1996

Publication title -

scientometrics

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.999

H-Index - 116

eISSN - 1588-2861

pISSN - 0138-9130

DOI - 10.1007/bf02017315

Subject(s) - selection (genetic algorithm) , impact factor , contrast (vision) , computer science , scientometrics , publication , statistics , operations research , econometrics , mathematics , library science , political science , business , advertising , artificial intelligence , law

A model experiment is presented for thequantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators used in evaluating the scientific impact of papers. The Relative Subfield Citedness (Rw) indicator proved to be the most appropriate according to the criteria chosen. RW increases with the number of citations to the papers and, in contrast to other relative impact indicators, does not decrease if an author chooses to publish most of his papers in journals with large impact factors or if most of the citations to his papers are to the ones in journals with the largest impact factors.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research