Value similarity about human resources, competitiveness and social responsibility: A study of organizational and suborganizational differences
Author(s) -
Gerald E. Fryxell,
Cathy A. Enz
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
international journal of value-based management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1572-8528
pISSN - 0895-8815
DOI - 10.1007/bf01732419
Subject(s) - similarity (geometry) , value (mathematics) , perception , universality (dynamical systems) , social responsibility , uniqueness , human resources , social psychology , business , psychology , knowledge management , political science , public relations , management , economics , mathematics , statistics , computer science , physics , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , neuroscience , image (mathematics)
This study explored the perception of value similarity between employees and top management. Three types of organizational values were identified including values concerning the use of human resources, the competitiveness of the firm, and the importance of social responsibility. Two organizations and two subpopulations within one organization were examined to determine if differences exist in the way different groups configure their values. The results revealed that the importance of value similarity on the use of human resources was “univocal” or common to both organizations and subpopulations. In contrast, similarity on competitiveness values and social responsibility values were found to vary and thus operate uniquely for different organizations and subgroups. The implications of these findings for the universality versus uniqueness debate within the culture literature and the future measurement of organizational value constructs are discussed.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom