The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Abbreviated PAD Emotion Scales | Zendy

Xiaoming Li | Zendy; Haotian Zhou | Zendy; Shengzun Song | Zendy; Ran Tian | Zendy; Xiaolan Fu | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Abbreviated PAD Emotion Scales

Author(s) -

Xiaoming Li,

Haotian Zhou,

Shengzun Song,

Ran Tian,

Xiaolan Fu

Publication year - 2005

Publication title -

lecture notes in computer science

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Book series

SCImago Journal Rank - 0.249

H-Index - 400

eISSN - 1611-3349

pISSN - 0302-9743

ISBN - 3-540-29621-2

DOI - 10.1007/11573548_66

Subject(s) - reliability (semiconductor) , validity , criterion validity , psychology , arousal , scale (ratio) , computer science , clinical psychology , psychometrics , social psychology , construct validity , power (physics) , cartography , physics , quantum mechanics , geography

The study aimed at testing the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Abbreviated PAD Emotion Scales using a Chinese sample. 297 Chinese undergraduate students were tested with the Chinese version of Abbreviated PAD Emotion Scales; 98 of them were retested with the same scales after seven days in order to assess the test-retest reliability; and 102 of them were tested with SCL-90 at the same time which was intended as criteria for validity to assess the criterion validity. The results showed that the Chinese version of Abbreviated PAD Emotion Scales displayed satisfying reliability and validity on P (pleasure-displeasure), only moderate reliability and validity on D (dominance-submissiveness), but quite low reliability and validity on A (arousal-nonarousal).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research