z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Commitment in Cases of Trust and Distrust
Author(s) -
Tallant Jonathan
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
thought: a journal of philosophy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.429
H-Index - 8
ISSN - 2161-2234
DOI - 10.1002/tht3.259
Subject(s) - distrust , epistemology , positive economics , psychology , social psychology , political science , philosophy , economics , law
There is a well‐developed literature on trust.[Note 1. See, for instance, Baier (), Faulkner (), Hardin (), ...] Distrust, on the other hand, has gathered far less attention in the philosophical literature (though there is a burgeoning business literature on the topic[Note 2. E.g. Cho (), Kramer (), Lewicki et al. (), ...]). A recent exception to that trend in the philosophical literature is Hawley (2014, 2015) who develops a unified account of both trust and distrust. My aim in this paper is to present arguments against her account of trust and distrust, though then to also suggest a patch.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom