z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Patterning pluripotency in embryonic stem cells
Author(s) -
Zhang Yue Shelby,
Sevilla Ana,
Wan Leo Q.,
Lemischka Ihor R.,
VunjakNovakovic Gordana
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
stem cells
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.159
H-Index - 229
eISSN - 1549-4918
pISSN - 1066-5099
DOI - 10.1002/stem.1468
Subject(s) - biology , embryonic stem cell , stem cell , microbiology and biotechnology , rex1 , homeobox protein nanog , induced pluripotent stem cell , genetics , gene
Developmental gradients of morphogens and the formation of boundaries guide the choices between self‐renewal and differentiation in stem cells. Still, surprisingly little is known about gene expression signatures of differentiating stem cells at the boundaries between regions. We thus combined inducible gene expression with a microfluidic technology to pattern gene expression in murine embryonic stem cells. Regional depletion of the Nanog transcriptional regulator was achieved through the exposure of cells to microfluidic gradients of morphogens. In this way, we established pluripotency‐differentiation boundaries between Nanog expressing cells ( pluripotency zone ) and Nanog suppressed cells ( early differentiation zone ) within the same cell population, with a gradient of Nanog expression across the individual cell colonies, to serve as a mimic of the developmental process. Using this system, we identified strong interactions between Nanog and its target genes by constructing a network with Nanog as the root and the measured levels of gene expression in each region. Gene expression patterns at the pluripotency‐differentiation boundaries recreated in vitro were similar to those in the developing blastocyst. This approach to the study of cellular commitment at the boundaries between gene expression domains, a phenomenon critical for understanding of early development, has potential to benefit fundamental research of stem cells and their application in regenerative medicine. S tem C ells 2013;31:1806‐1815

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here