Open AccessPrioritising crop wild relatives to enhance agricultural resilience in sub‐Saharan Africa under climate change
Author(s) -
Satori David,
Tovar Carolina,
Faruk Aisyah,
Hammond Hunt Eleanor,
Muller Gemma,
Cockel Christopher,
Kühn Nicola,
Leitch Ilia J.,
Lulekal Ermias,
Pereira Laura,
Ryan Philippa,
Willis Katherine J.,
Piro Samuel
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
plants, people, planet
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2572-2611
DOI - 10.1002/ppp3.10247
Subject(s) - climate change , threatened species , agriculture , livelihood , crop diversity , agroforestry , food security , geography , agricultural biodiversity , crop , in situ conservation , psychological resilience , ex situ conservation , climate resilience , environmental resource management , biology , ecology , environmental science , endangered species , genetic diversity , population , forestry , psychology , habitat , psychotherapist , demography , archaeology , sociology
Social Impact Statement Climate change is expected to disproportionately affect sub‐Saharan Africa in the next century, posing a threat to the livelihoods of smallholder farmers and deepening food insecurity. To adapt to this threat, more climate‐resilient crops need to be brought into the food system; these may be developed through breeding with crop wild relatives with key traits to cope with climate change. Here, we assess the level of open‐access trait documentation of crop wild relatives of 29 important crops, their resilience, how threatened they are in situ, how well they are preserved ex situ and we provide priorities for their conservation and use in breeding programmes. Summary Climate change is projected to adversely affect smallholder agriculture in sub‐Saharan Africa (SSA) over the next century, with many areas becoming unsuitable for growing crops. Breeding programmes using crop wild relatives (CWRs) that are pre‐adapted to projected future climatic conditions may lead to more resilient crops, but their traits have not been screened across a large diversity of CWRs. Furthermore, many are threatened and require greater protection in situ and ex situ to prevent the loss of an important adaptive solution to climate change. A previous ecogeographical study found that 303 out of 836 CWRs of 29 major crops cultivated across SSA may represent priorities for future crop resilience. Here, we assessed the availability of trait information and compared traits between resilient and non‐resilient CWRs. Subsequently, we analysed the conservation status of CWRs in situ and ex situ to set new global priorities for protection. Our findings show that the traits of many CWRs are poorly described, but for those species with better coverage, key differences between resilient and non‐resilient CWRs were identified, including lower plant height amongst resilient CWRs of tree crops (arabica and robusta coffee, mango and cacao) and a higher likelihood of invasive CWRs to be resilient. We found that 14% and 36% of resilient CWRs are threatened in situ and absent from seed collections, respectively. Our study highlights CWR priorities for conservation based on resilience. A concerted international effort is recommended to conserve CWRs and improve agricultural resilience in a changing climate.