z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Viscoelastic properties and phase behavior of 12‐ tert ‐butyl ester dendrimer/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends
Author(s) -
Emran S. K.,
Liu Y.,
Newkome G. R.,
Harmon J. P.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of polymer science part b: polymer physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1099-0488
pISSN - 0887-6266
DOI - 10.1002/polb.1110
Subject(s) - dendrimer , miscibility , differential scanning calorimetry , materials science , polymer chemistry , poly(methyl methacrylate) , methyl methacrylate , glass transition , viscoelasticity , dielectric , phase (matter) , activation energy , relaxation (psychology) , dynamic mechanical analysis , analytical chemistry (journal) , chemistry , polymer , composite material , thermodynamics , organic chemistry , copolymer , psychology , social psychology , physics , optoelectronics
This study used refractometry, ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and dielectric analysis to assess the viscoelastic properties and phase behavior of blends containing 0–20% (w/w) 12‐ tert ‐butyl ester dendrimer in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Dendritic blends were miscible up through 12%, exhibiting an intermediate glass‐transition temperature ( T g ; α) between those of the two pure components. Interactions of PMMA CO groups and dendrimer NH groups contributed to miscibility. T g decreased with increasing dendrimer content before phase separation. The dendrimer exhibited phase separation at 15%, as revealed by Rayleigh scattering in ultraviolet–visible spectra and the emergence of a second T g in dielectric studies. Before phase separation, clear, secondary β relaxations for PMMA were observed at low frequencies via dielectric analysis. Apparent activation energies were obtained through Arrhenius characterization. A merged αβ process for PMMA occurred at higher frequencies and temperatures in the blends. Dielectric data for the phase‐separated dendrimer relaxation (α D ) in the 20% blend conformed to Williams–Landel–Ferry behavior, which allowed the calculation of the apparent activation energy. The α D relaxation data, analyzed both before and after treatment with the electric modulus, compared well with neat dendrimer data, which confirmed that this relaxation was due to an isolated dendrimer phase. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 39: 1381–1393, 2001

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom