Viscoelastic properties and phase behavior of 12‐ tert ‐butyl ester dendrimer/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends
Author(s) -
Emran S. K.,
Liu Y.,
Newkome G. R.,
Harmon J. P.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of polymer science part b: polymer physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1099-0488
pISSN - 0887-6266
DOI - 10.1002/polb.1110
Subject(s) - dendrimer , miscibility , differential scanning calorimetry , materials science , polymer chemistry , poly(methyl methacrylate) , methyl methacrylate , glass transition , viscoelasticity , dielectric , phase (matter) , activation energy , relaxation (psychology) , dynamic mechanical analysis , analytical chemistry (journal) , chemistry , polymer , composite material , thermodynamics , organic chemistry , copolymer , psychology , social psychology , physics , optoelectronics
This study used refractometry, ultraviolet–visible spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and dielectric analysis to assess the viscoelastic properties and phase behavior of blends containing 0–20% (w/w) 12‐ tert ‐butyl ester dendrimer in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). Dendritic blends were miscible up through 12%, exhibiting an intermediate glass‐transition temperature ( T g ; α) between those of the two pure components. Interactions of PMMA CO groups and dendrimer NH groups contributed to miscibility. T g decreased with increasing dendrimer content before phase separation. The dendrimer exhibited phase separation at 15%, as revealed by Rayleigh scattering in ultraviolet–visible spectra and the emergence of a second T g in dielectric studies. Before phase separation, clear, secondary β relaxations for PMMA were observed at low frequencies via dielectric analysis. Apparent activation energies were obtained through Arrhenius characterization. A merged αβ process for PMMA occurred at higher frequencies and temperatures in the blends. Dielectric data for the phase‐separated dendrimer relaxation (α D ) in the 20% blend conformed to Williams–Landel–Ferry behavior, which allowed the calculation of the apparent activation energy. The α D relaxation data, analyzed both before and after treatment with the electric modulus, compared well with neat dendrimer data, which confirmed that this relaxation was due to an isolated dendrimer phase. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 39: 1381–1393, 2001
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom