Dynamic Capabilities in Complex Projects: The Case of London Heathrow Terminal 5

Whereas existing approaches and empirical studies of dynamic capabilities focus on the strategic innovation activities of firms (i.e., permanent organizations executing multiple projects and programs), this article identifies how certain types of dynamic capabilities are required to deliver large, complex, and risky projects involving multiple parties. Our longitudinal study of the design and construction of H eathrow A irport T erminal 5 by the B ritish A irports A uthority ( BAA ) makes three main contributions to the literature: (1) It contributes to the project management literature by identifying how specific dynamic capabilities ( BAA ’s “ T5 Agreement,” strategic behaviors, and collaborative processes) are developed through a three‐phase process (learning, codifying, and mobilizing) to support the strategic management of complex projects. (2) W hile emphasizing their importance for the successful management of complex projects, our findings also underline the continuing fragility of dynamic capabilities. (3) T he case study reveals their fluidity and balancing role with respect to demands for stability and change in complex, uncertain, and volatile project environments.