Rallying the Troops or Beating the Horses? How Project‐Related Demands Can Lead to Either High‐Performance or Abusive Supervision
Author(s) -
Gallagher Erin C.,
Mazur Alicia K.,
Ashkanasy Neal M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
project management journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.454
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1938-9507
pISSN - 8756-9728
DOI - 10.1002/pmj.21500
Subject(s) - abusive supervision , work (physics) , project manager , process (computing) , psychology , personality , project management , project sponsorship , business , public relations , knowledge management , project management triangle , project charter , management , social psychology , engineering , computer science , political science , mechanical engineering , economics , operating system
In today's high‐pressure work environment, project managers are often forced to “do more with less.” We argue that this imperative can lead project managers to engage in either high‐performance or abusive supervision behaviors. To understand this process, we develop a model and associated propositions linking a project manager's cognitive appraisal of project‐related demands to high‐performance work practices versus abusive supervision behaviors—both of which impact three project outcomes: stakeholder relationships, people‐related project success factors, and employee well‐being. We propose that the choice between high‐performance work practices and abusive supervision behaviors is moderated by a project manager's personal resources (psychological capital, emotional intelligence, and dark triad personality).
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom