z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Core Judgments of Instructional Designers in Practice
Author(s) -
Boling Elizabeth,
Alangari Husa,
Hajdu Ilona Marie,
Guo Meize,
Gyabak Khendum,
Khlaif Zuheir,
Kizilboga Remzi,
Tomita Kei,
Alsaif Manal,
Lachheb Ahmed,
Bae Haesol,
Ergulec Fatih,
Zhu Meina,
Basdogan Merve,
Buggs Candace,
Sari Annisa,
Techawitthayachinda Ratrapee “Inging”
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
performance improvement quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.282
H-Index - 17
eISSN - 1937-8327
pISSN - 0898-5952
DOI - 10.1002/piq.21250
Subject(s) - perspective (graphical) , core (optical fiber) , instructional design , tacit knowledge , field (mathematics) , process (computing) , psychology , affect (linguistics) , design elements and principles , computer science , knowledge management , mathematics education , artificial intelligence , communication , mathematics , pure mathematics , operating system , software engineering , telecommunications
The tacit beliefs that affect all the judgments made during the design process (core judgments) of 11 practicing instructional designers were studied via their discussions of strong and weak designs during interviews. Transcripts were analyzed from a phenomenological perspective. The study demonstrates that while designer judgment is rarely discussed in the field, these designers do appear to bring core judgments to bear on their designing, and these judgments are complex in nature. Researchers argue that core judgment, unaccounted for in rational models of instructional design, requires further attention from scholars and design educators.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom