z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparing city policies on mandatory drug testing: A process evaluation
Author(s) -
Strickland Ruth Ann,
Whicker Marcia Lynn
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
national civic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1542-7811
pISSN - 0027-9013
DOI - 10.1002/ncr.4100790605
Subject(s) - decree , legislation , government (linguistics) , presidential system , business , process (computing) , function (biology) , public relations , public administration , law , political science , computer science , politics , philosophy , linguistics , evolutionary biology , biology , operating system
Presidential decree and federal legislation have resulted in substantial employee drug testing at all levels of government as well as among private sector contractors. Joining the War on Drugs, many other employers have taken up the practice voluntarily. However we may feel about the arguments for and against drug testing — whether on the basis of public safety, integrity, access to sensitive information, etc. — the fact remains that drug testing policies are non‐uniform and unevenly applied, and the common testing technologies are unreliable. If we believe as a society that drug testing serves a legitimate public function consistent with our cultural and legal values, then uniform standards and procedures must be developed. If not, we should give greater consideration to alternative measures, such as employee education and assistance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom