Premium
Characterization and correction of diffusion gradient‐induced eddy currents in second‐order motion‐compensated echo‐planar and spiral cardiac DTI
Author(s) -
Gorkum Robbert J. H.,
Guenthner Christian,
Koethe Andreas,
Stoeck Christian T.,
Kozerke Sebastian
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.29378
Subject(s) - eddy current , physics , nuclear magnetic resonance , amplitude , diffusion , imaging phantom , scaling , impulse response , spiral (railway) , mechanics , mathematical analysis , optics , geometry , mathematics , quantum mechanics , thermodynamics
Purpose Very high gradient amplitudes played out over extended time intervals as required for second‐order motion‐compensated cardiac DTI may violate the assumption of a linear time‐invariant gradient system model. The aim of this work was to characterize diffusion gradient‐related system nonlinearity and propose a correction approach for echo‐planar and spiral spin‐echo motion‐compensated cardiac DTI. Methods Diffusion gradient‐induced eddy currents of 9 diffusion directions were characterized at b values of 150 s/mm 2 and 450 s/mm 2 for a 1.5 Tesla system and used to correct phantom, ex vivo, and in vivo motion‐compensated cardiac DTI data acquired with echo‐planar and spiral trajectories. Predicted trajectories were calculated using gradient impulse response function and diffusion gradient strength‐ and direction‐dependent zeroth‐ and first‐order eddy current responses. A reconstruction method was implemented using the predictedk $$ k $$ ‐space trajectories to additionally include off‐resonances and concomitant fields. Resulting images were compared to a reference reconstruction omitting diffusion gradient‐induced eddy current correction. Results Diffusion gradient‐induced eddy currents exhibited nonlinear effects when scaling up the gradient amplitude and could not be described by a 3D basis alone. This indicates that a gradient impulse response function does not suffice to describe diffusion gradient‐induced eddy currents. Zeroth‐ and first‐order diffusion gradient‐induced eddy current effects of up to −1.7 rad and −16 to +12 rad/m, respectively, were identified. Zeroth‐ and first‐order diffusion gradient‐induced eddy current correction yielded improved image quality upon image reconstruction. Conclusion The proposed approach offers correction of diffusion gradient‐induced zeroth‐ and first‐order eddy currents, reducing image distortions to promote improvements of second‐order motion‐compensated spin‐echo cardiac DTI.