Open AccessSex differences in efficacy of pharmacological therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Danielson Cecilia,
Lileikyte Gabriele,
Ouwerkerk Wouter,
S.P. Lam Carolyn,
Erlinge David,
Teng TiewHwa Katherine
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
esc heart failure
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.787
H-Index - 25
ISSN - 2055-5822
DOI - 10.1002/ehf2.13974
Subject(s) - medicine , ejection fraction , heart failure , hazard ratio , meta analysis , randomized controlled trial , confidence interval , cochrane library , cardiology
Aims Recent studies have suggested potential sex differences in treatment response to pharmacological therapies in heart failure (HF). We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies comparing treatment effects between men and women with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) using established guideline‐directed medical therapy and other emerging pharmacological treatments. Methods and results Systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials published in 1990–2021. Outcomes were all‐cause mortality and combined outcome of all‐cause mortality and/or hospitalization for HF. Of 618 articles identified, 25 articles and 100 213 patients (mean age 62 ± 1.7 years, women 23.1%, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 26.6 ± 1.3%) were included in the systematic review and meta‐analysis. For the outcome of all‐cause mortality, there was no evidence of treatment heterogeneity by sex for renin‐angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.75–0.99) in men; HR 0.97 (0.77–1.23) in women; P interaction = 0.288], or for beta‐blockers (BB) [HR 0.71 (0.59–0.86) in men; HR 0.87 (0.73–1.03) in women; P interaction = 0.345]. Similarly, for the composite outcome of death or HF hospitalization, there was no evidence of treatment heterogeneity by sex for RASi [HR 0.84 (0.77–0.93) in men; HR 0.94 (0.81–1.08) in women; P interaction = 0.210] or BB [HR 0.76 (0.64–0.90) in men; HR 0.72 (0.60–0.86) in women; P interaction = 0.650]. Results for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) from previously published meta‐analyses were included in the review. For the combined outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, no significant interaction for sex was observed for MRA ( P interaction = 0.78) or SGLT2i ( P interaction = 0.37). Results for emerging pharmacological treatments, such as soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators and cardiac myosin activators, were included in the review and showed consistent treatment effects between men and women. Conclusions Our meta‐analysis showed no differences between sex in treatment effect for BB and RASi. Review on previously published trials for MRA, SGLT2i, and emerging therapies presented consistent treatment effects between men and women.