z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Inhibitory functioning across ADHD subtypes: Recent findings, clinical implications, and future directions
Author(s) -
Adams Zachary W.,
Derefinko Karen J.,
Milich Richard,
Fillmore Mark T.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
developmental disabilities research reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1940-5529
pISSN - 1940-5510
DOI - 10.1002/ddrr.37
Subject(s) - psychology , context (archaeology) , attention deficit hyperactivity disorder , intervention (counseling) , developmental psychology , clinical psychology , cognitive psychology , neuroscience , psychiatry , biology , paleontology
Abstract Although growing consensus supports the role of deficient behavioral inhibition as a central feature of the combined subtype of ADHD (ADHD/C; Barkley 1997 Psychol Bull 121:65–94; Nigg 2001 Psychol Bull 127:571–598), little research has focused on how this finding generalizes to the primarily inattentive subtype (ADHD/I). This question holds particular relevance in light of recent work suggesting that ADHD/I might be better characterized as a disorder separate from ADHD/C (Diamond 2005 Dev Psychopathol 17:807–825; Milich et al. 2001 Clin Psychol Sci Pract 8:463–488). This article describes major findings in the area of inhibitory performance in ADHD and highlights recent research suggesting important areas of divergence between the subtypes. In particular, preliminary findings point to potential differences between the subtypes with respect to how children process important contextual information from the environment, such as preparatory cues that precede responses and rewarding or punishing feedback following behavior. These suggestive findings are discussed in the context of treatment implications, which could involve differential intervention approaches for each subtype targeted to the specific deficit profiles that characterize each group of children. Future research avenues aimed toward building a sound theoretical model of ADHD/I and a better understanding of its relation to ADHD/C are also presented. Specifically, investigators are encouraged to continue studying the complex interplay between inhibitory and attentional processes, as this area seems particularly promising in its ability to improve our understanding of the potentially distinct pathologies underlying the ADHD subtypes. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2008;14:268–275.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here