Refining and testing joint fact‐finding for environmental dispute resolution: Ten years of success | Zendy

McCreary Scott T | Zendy; Gamman John K. | Zendy; Brooks Bennett | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Refining and testing joint fact‐finding for environmental dispute resolution: Ten years of success

Author(s) -

McCreary Scott T,

Gamman John K.,

Brooks Bennett

Publication year - 2001

Publication title -

mediation quarterly

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

eISSN - 1932-7544

pISSN - 0739-4098

DOI - 10.1002/crq.3890180403

Subject(s) - cornerstone , joint (building) , dispute resolution , field (mathematics) , political science , resolution (logic) , engineering ethics , public relations , computer science , management science , psychology , law and economics , engineering , law , sociology , geography , artificial intelligence , civil engineering , mathematics , archaeology , pure mathematics

10.1002/crq.3890180403.abs For the past decade, we at CONCUR have been mediating complex environmental disputes and using the technique of joint fact‐finding as a cornerstone of our model of practice. In this article, we present and reflect on this body of experience, with the goal of better informing both our colleagues in the field and other potential users of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) about the elements and preconditions for successful use of joint fact‐finding. We also aim to contribute actively to current initiatives on best practices.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research