z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Developing a protein‐interactions ontology
Author(s) -
Ratsch Esther,
Schultz Jörg,
Saric Jasmin,
Lavin Philipp Cimiano,
Wittig Ulrike,
Reyle Uwe,
Rojas Isabel
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
comparative and functional genomics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1532-6268
pISSN - 1531-6912
DOI - 10.1002/cfg.244
Subject(s) - ontology , computer science , function (biology) , annotation , vocabulary , data science , focus (optics) , domain (mathematical analysis) , field (mathematics) , gene ontology , information retrieval , open biomedical ontologies , process ontology , upper ontology , suggested upper merged ontology , semantic web , artificial intelligence , philosophy , biology , epistemology , mathematics , mathematical analysis , linguistics , gene expression , chemistry , optics , biochemistry , evolutionary biology , physics , pure mathematics , gene
The prediction and analysis of a protein’s function is an ongoing challenge in the field of genomics. With upcoming datasets on protein interactions [9], it is becoming evident that the function of a protein can only be understood when taking its interaction with other molecules into account. Most current approaches to the classification and description of protein function, such as the Gene Ontology [8], focus on single proteins. These annotation efforts should be paralleled by the development of ontologies dealing with the interactions of a protein with other biomolecules. Currently, most approaches to building such ontologies focus on metabolism [3,6]. So far, for interactions, only high-level classifications have been created [4], developed to assist information extraction from text. In addition to assisting text mining, a more fine-grained (in comparison to these classifications) ontology on protein interactions could be helpful in database development and information mining. As an ontology captures domain knowledge in a computer-understandable way, it can be used for inferencing, i.e. deriving new knowledge from existing data. There are two important points to consider in developing such a formal ontology: (a) it should be independent of its final use; and (b) it should not only restrict itself to a controlled vocabulary but the concepts should be related to each other in a semantically consistent manner, and rules governing these definitions and relations should be incorporated whenever necessary. Here we describe our approach for developing such an ontology.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here