Radiological quality of coronary guiding catheters: A quantitative analysis
Author(s) -
Herrman JeanPaul R.,
Keane David,
Ozaki Yukio,
Boer Ad Den,
Serruys Patrick W.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1097-0304
pISSN - 0098-6569
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.1810330115
Subject(s) - medicine , catheter , coronary angiography , contrast medium , calibration , radiology , radiological weapon , biomedical engineering , cardiology , statistics , mathematics , myocardial infarction
Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is a validated and widely accepted method to investigate changes in arterial dimension over time. Calibration of measurements is enabled by the use of the coronary catheter as a scaling device. The dimensions and laminar composition of coronary catheters, however, have changed significantly over recent years and the suitability of the current generation of coronary catheters for calibration purposes has not been validated. We therefore recorded 57 coronary guiding catheters on cinefilm, and compared their automated quantitative measurements (Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System, CAAS) with their true values (precision micrometer). We found an overall underestimation of quantitatively derived dimensions, ranging from −8.9 to +4% for water‐filled catheters and from −15.5 to −3.9% for contrast‐filled catheters. In conclusion, while the current generation of coronary guiding catheters shows a wide variety in radiological quality, it can be clearly detected by the CAAS system, and is suitable for calibration of QCA measurements (with the exception of the DVI atherectomy catheter), provided that calibration is done on contrast‐empty catheters. © Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom