z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Assessment of dimensions and image quality of coronary contrast catheters from cineangiograms
Author(s) -
Reiber Johan H. C.,
Kooijman Cornelis J.,
Boer Ad Den,
Serruys Patrick W.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1097-0304
pISSN - 0098-6569
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.1810110512
Subject(s) - catheter , medicine , image quality , contrast medium , radiology , contrast (vision) , nuclear medicine , biomedical engineering , surgery , optics , image (mathematics) , computer vision , physics , computer science
In the quantitative assessment of coronary arterial dimensions from coronary cineangiograms, the contrast catheter is usually used as a scaling device, requiring the definition of the catheter contours by semi‐ or fully automated contour detection procedures. The image quality of the x‐ray radiated catheter is dependent on the catheter material, concentration of the contrast agent in the catheter, and kilovoltage of the x‐ray source. The effects of these variables on the image quality and accuracy of the size‐measurement of the filmed catheters were studied for four different catheter materials: woven dacron (wd), polyvinylchloride (pv), polyurethane (pu), and nylon. The following parameters were studied: measured size, image contrast, and average brightness gradient along the edges of the displayed catheters. The average differences of the angiographically measured size with the true size for the wd, pv, pu, and nylon catheters were +0.2, ‐ 3.2, ‐ 3.5, and + 9.8%, respectively. The image contrast at various fillings of the catheters was roughly identical for the wd, pv, and pu catheters, and significantly lower for the nylon catheter. Image gradient was highest for the wd catheter, followed by the pv and pu catheters, and lowest for the nylon catheter. From these data it may be concluded that the woven dacron catheter is most suitable for quantitative coronary angiographic studies. The polyvinylchloride and polyurethane catheters perform about equally well but slightly less than the woven dacron catheter. The nylon catheter should not be used for such quantitative studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom