z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pooled long‐term outcomes from two randomized trials of axillary node sampling with axillary radiotherapy versus axillary node clearance in patients with operable node‐positive breast cancer
Author(s) -
Bing A. U.,
Kerr G. R.,
Jack W.,
Chetty U.,
Williams L. J.,
Rodger A.,
Dixon J. M.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1002/bjs.9952
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , hazard ratio , randomized controlled trial , proportional hazards model , axilla , surgery , oncology , cancer , confidence interval
Background The aim was to determine long‐term overall, breast cancer‐specific and metastasis‐free survival as well as axillary relapse rate from a pooled analysis of two randomized trials in women with operable breast cancer. These trials compared axillary node sampling ( ANS ), combined with axillary radiotherapy ( AXRT ) if the sampled nodes were involved, with axillary node clearance ( ANC ). Methods Data from two clinical trials at the Edinburgh Breast Unit that randomized patients between 1980 and 1995 were pooled. Long‐term survival was analysed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression, with separate analyses for patients with node‐positive ( ANS + AXRT versus ANC ) and node‐negative ( ANS versus ANC ) disease. Results Of 855 women randomized, 799 were included in the present analysis after a median follow‐up of 19·4 years. Some 301 patients (37·7 per cent) had node‐positive disease. There was no evidence of a breast cancer survival advantage for ANS versus ANC in patients with node‐negative disease (hazard ratio ( HR ) 0·88, 95 per cent c.i. 0·58 to 1·34; P = 0·557), or for ANS + AXRT versus ANC in those with node‐positive breast cancer ( HR 1·07, 0·77 to 1·50; P = 0·688). There was no metastasis‐free survival advantage for ANS versus ANC in patients with node‐negative tumours ( HR 1·03, 0·70 to 1·51; P = 0·877), or ANS + AXRT versus ANC in those with node‐positive disease ( HR 1·03, 0·75 to 1·43; P = 0·847). Node‐negative patients who underwent ANS had a higher risk of axillary recurrence than those who had ANC ( HR 3·53, 1·29 to 9·63; P = 0·014). Similarly, among women with node‐positive tumours, the risk of axillary recurrence was greater after ANS + AXRT than ANC ( HR 2·64, 1·00 to 6·95; P = 0·049). Conclusion Despite a higher rate of axillary recurrence with ANS combined with radiotherapy to the axilla, ANC did not improve overall, breast cancer‐specific or metastasis‐free survival. Axillary recurrence is thus not a satisfactory endpoint when comparing axillary treatments.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom