
Outcomes after implementing a tailored endoscopic step‐up approach to walled‐off necrosis in acute pancreatitis
Author(s) -
Bang J. Y.,
Holt B. A.,
Hawes R. H.,
Hasan M. K.,
Arnoletti J. P.,
Christein J. D.,
Wilcox C. M.,
Varadarajulu S.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1002/bjs.9664
Subject(s) - medicine , necrosis , odds ratio , confidence interval , logistic regression , surgery , observational study , pancreatitis , endoscopy , acute pancreatitis , algorithm , computer science
Background The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of patients with pancreatic or peripancreatic walled‐off necrosis by endoscopy using the conventional approach versus an algorithmic approach based on the collection size, location and stepwise response to intervention. Methods This was an observational before–after study of consecutive patients managed over two time intervals. In the initial period (2004–2009) symptomatic patients with walled‐off necrosis underwent conventional single transmural drainage with placement of two stents and a nasocystic catheter, followed by direct endoscopic necrosectomy, if required. In the later period (2010–2013) an algorithmic approach was adopted based on size and extent of the walled‐off necrosis and stepwise response to intervention. The main outcome was treatment success, defined as a reduction in walled‐off necrosis size to 2 cm or less on CT after 8 weeks. Results Forty‐seven patients were treated in the first interval and 53 in the second. There was no difference in patient demographics, clinical or walled‐off necrosis characteristics and laboratory parameters between the groups, apart from a higher proportion of women and Caucasians in the later period. The treatment success rate was higher for the algorithmic approach compared with conventional treatment (91 versus 60 per cent respectively; P < 0·001). On multivariable logistic regression, management based on the algorithm was the only predictor of treatment success (odds ratio 6·51, 95 per cent c.i. 2·19 to 19·37; P = 0·001). Conclusion An algorithmic approach to pancreatic and peripancreatic walled‐off necrosis, based on the collection size, location and stepwise response to intervention, resulted in an improved rate of treatment success compared with conventional endoscopic management.