Open AccessMeta‐analysis of peak wall stress in ruptured, symptomatic and intact abdominal aortic aneurysms
Author(s) -
Khosla S.,
Morris D. R.,
Moxon J. V.,
Walker P. J.,
Gasser T. C.,
Golledge J.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1002/bjs.9578
Subject(s) - medicine , asymptomatic , confidence interval , abdominal aortic aneurysm , cardiology , meta analysis , aneurysm , radiology , surgery
Background Abdominal aortic aneurysm ( AAA ) is an important cause of sudden death; however, there are currently incomplete means to predict the risk of AAA rupture. AAA peak wall stress ( PWS ) can be estimated using finite element analysis ( FEA ) methods from computed tomography ( CT ) scans. The question is whether AAA PWS can predict AAA rupture. The aim of this systematic review was to compare PWS in patients with ruptured and intact AAA . Methods The MEDLINE database was searched on 25 May 2013. Case–control studies assessing PWS in asymptomatic intact, and acutely symptomatic or ruptured AAA from CT scans using FEA were included. Data were extracted independently. A random‐effects model was used to calculate standard mean differences ( SMDs ) for PWS measurements. Results Nine studies assessing 348 individuals were identified and used in the meta‐analysis. Results from 204 asymptomatic intact and 144 symptomatic or ruptured AAAs showed that PWS was significantly greater in the symptomatic/ ruptured AAAs compared with the asymptomatic intact AAAs ( SMD 0·95, 95 per cent confidence interval 0·71 to 1·18; P < 0·001). The findings remained significant after adjustment for mean systolic blood pressure, standardized at 120 mmHg ( SMD 0·68, 0·39 to 0·96; P < 0·001). Minimal heterogeneity between studies was noted ( I 2 = 0 per cent). Conclusion This study suggests that PWS is greater in symptomatic or ruptured AAA than in asymptomatic intact AAA.