Open AccessFunctional complaints and quality of life after transanal total mesorectal excision: a meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Heijden J. A. G.,
Koëter T.,
Smits L. J. H.,
Sietses C.,
Tuynman J. B.,
MaaskantBraat A. J. G.,
Klarenbeek B. R.,
Wilt J. H. W.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1002/bjs.11566
Subject(s) - medicine , total mesorectal excision , meta analysis , cochrane library , surgery , medline , quality of life (healthcare) , colorectal cancer , cancer , nursing , political science , law
Background Total mesorectal excision (TME) gives excellent oncological results in rectal cancer treatment, but patients may experience functional problems. A novel approach to performing TME is by single‐port transanal minimally invasive surgery. This systematic review evaluated the functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal and laparoscopic TME. Methods A comprehensive search in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and the trial registers was conducted in May 2019. PRISMA guidelines were used. Data for meta‐analysis were pooled using a random‐effects model. Results A total of 11 660 studies were identified, from which 14 studies and six conference abstracts involving 846 patients (599 transanal TME, 247 laparoscopic TME) were included. A substantial number of patients experienced functional problems consistent with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Meta‐analysis found no significant difference in major LARS between the two approaches (risk ratio 1·13, 95 per cent c.i. 0·94 to 1·35; P = 0·18). However, major heterogeneity was present in the studies together with poor reporting of functional baseline assessment. Conclusion No differences in function were observed between transanal and laparoscopic TME.